Social Media

The »John Terry will leave Chelsea FC« tweet: A comparison of semiotic modes – picture vs. language

John Terry will leave Chelsea FC | Source: twitter.com/espnfc

Source: twitter.com/espnfc

Brands can create social media posts containing anecdotes, photos, videos, or other material and their fans and followers can then interact with these posts by liking or commenting on them (Vries et al, 2012:84). In addition, the increasing dominance of images over words and their omnipresence in today’s communicative culture have often been deplored (Stoeckl, 2009:4).

Stoeckl (2009) compared the semiotic modes between ‘picture and language’ in advertising and concluded that whatever the design behind image and [language-]linking might be, advertisers are keen to use them as strategic tools to effectively develop their arguments, and because the ads are semiotically minimalist, recipients need to invest some decoding efforts in order to generate communicative relevance and sense.

In the following exercise, we analyse a given tweet from ESPN FC using the four levels suggested by Stoeckl (2009): semiotics, perceptual/cognitive, semantics, and pragmatics. We chose a tweet from @ESPNFC dated 31 January 2016 that includes a picture and text breaking the news of John Terry leaving Chelsea FC at the end of the season 2015/16.

Semiotics (sign system)

Stoeckl (2009:8) writes: “Pictures are close to our perceptual experience (cf. Sachs-Hombach 2003: 73ff) and need no re- or transcoding, as does language. A weak grammar (distinctive signs? combinatorial rules?) allows for vague meaning potential but not for definite, fixed meanings. Context, therefore, is paramount.”

In regard to the tweet at hand, the image shows John Terry, alone, on the pitch with his fists in the air, possibly cheering after a goal or a victory of his team. The copy of the tweet says, “John Terry has announced he will leave Chelsea at the end of the season. [line space] MORE: es.pn/1NJN5HB” The copy is indeed discrete, however, to the point. Emphasis lies on the word ‘MORE:’, which is spelled in capital letters and points to a link to the full article on the ESPN FC website.

Perceptual/Cognitive (understanding)

Stoeckl (2009:8) writes: “Access to pictorial signs is quick and seemingly effortless (holistic). In terms of the image’s impact on understanding and memory, it outperforms language (cf. Kroeber-Riel 1993: 53–96), which is cumbersome in its linearity and step-by-step logics.”

As noted by Stoeckl (2009:8), the image in the tweet can be assumed to have a strong impact on understanding and memory and is directly tied to emotions. Stoeckl (2009:8) claims that there is a weaker impact to memory and no direct tie to emotions in regard to language. Nevertheless, I claim that the recipient of the message needs to be considered in this case. The copy alone can have a strong emotional impact on fans of John Terry and/or Chelsea FC, given the impact Terry’s move can have on the club.

Semantics (meaning potential)

Stoeckl (2009:8) writes: “Pictures confront a number of semantic limitations: negating statements, expressing modality, definite illocutions and logically linking utterances all pose one or the other problem. Where language tends to be precise and sufficiently determined, pictures mostly exhibit a surplus of meaning, which cannot easily be tied down (cf. Gombrich 1996: 41–44).”

As mentioned above, ‘the image shows John Terry, alone, on the pitch with his fists in the air, possibly cheering after a goal or a victory of his team’. The image alone, without copy, can be interpreted in different ways. Being published on a football-Sunday, it can just mean that Chelsea FC won the match today, or John Terry signed a new contract at the club, etc. In terms of semantics, this image is indeed ‘semantically dense’.

Pragmatics (communicative functions)

Stoeckl (2009:9) writes: “As a consequence of all these properties, pictures fulfil different communicative functions than language. Pictures present objects, locations and situations in all their perceptive wealth and they are good at evoking feelings and aura. However, pictures cannot tell a story, unless in a sequence; something language is quite good at.”

Solely by looking at the image at hand, it cannot be assumed that John Terry will leave the club. Therefore, as noted by Stoeckl (2009), a content-thematic copy that narrates actions and explains logical relationships is in order.

IMHO

The four levels of mode differences as described by Stoeckl (2009) – semiotic, perceptual/cognitive, semantic, and pragmatic – are an effective way to analyse the relationship between images and copy in social media. Even though the trend towards more visual content seems to overtake the Internet, the opportunity to creatively play with the linkage of images and words can be fertile ground for new possibilities in marketing communications. I highly recommend considering the gaps that the above-mentioned four levels can fill in respect to each other and stretch the boundaries of their relationships. Thinking in terms of memes might be the most fruitful way to push the envelope.

Stoeckl (2009) A Comparison of Semiotic Modes – Picture vs Language

Source: Hartmut Stöckl (2009:8) Beyond Depicting.

Advertisements

Categories: Social Media

Tagged as: , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s